Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Sandali lang kuya Manuel...

Tama si pareng Willy, winning by a majority would be nice, but what arroyo needed after edsa dos was a clear mandate, an outcome that is credible and accepted by everybody, even her opponents -- and not necessarily winning by a majority.

Because of massive fraud in the 2004 elections, Arroyo never had that mandate (nor legitimacy.) but thru dagdag bawas, Arroyo was able to stay in power after 2004.

Eto pa ang analysis ni kuya Manuel re our past presidential election results.

The traditional strengths of the presidency haven’t been there for some time: a majority and not plurality mandate, and a party machinery solid enough to last at least as long as an administration’s term. The last time a president achieved an unquestionable majority was in 1965; the last real landslide was in 1969. Since then, the best percentage a post-Edsa president has managed was 39.6 percent (Estrada in 1998). But this only put him on a par with the most underwhelming presidency of the Third Republic, that of Carlos P. Garcia, lone plurality president of his time, who obtained 41.3 percent (over time, it’s the percentage, not the number of votes that matters, since our population is always increasing).

Hookay... Eto yung resulta ng past presidential elections from 1946-1998:

1946
roxas 2,471,926 - 54%
osmena sr. 1,129,996 - 45%
hilario moncado 8,538 - 0.34%

1949
quirino 1,803,808 - 51%
laurel 1,318,320 - 37%
Jose Avelino 419,890 - 12%

1953
magsaysay 2,912,992 - 69%
Quirino 1,313,991 - 31%

1957
Garcia 2,072,257 - 41%
Yulo 1,386,829 - 28%
Manahan 1,049,420 - 21%
Recto 429,226 - 8.55%
Quirino 60,328 - 1.2%
Santos 21,674 - 0.43%
Abcede 470 - 9.36e-5

1961
Macapagal 3,554,840 - 55%
Garcia 2,902,966 - 45%

1965
Marcos 3,861,324 - 52%
Macapagal 3,187,752 - 43%
Manglapus 384,564 - 5.2%
7 Others total 791 - 1.06e-2%

1969
Marcos 5,017,343 - 61%
Osmena Jr. 3,143,122 - 38%
10 Others total 1,339 - 1.64e-2%

1981
Marcos 18,309,360 - 91%
Alejo 1,716,449 - 9%

1986
Marcos 9,795,337 - 54%
Aquino 8,283,859 - 46%

1992
Ramos 5,342,521 - 24%
Santiago 4,468,173 - 20%
Cojuangco 4,116,376 - 18%
Mitra 3,316,661 - 15%
Marcos 2,338,294 - 10%
Salonga 2,302,123 - 10%
Laurel 770,046 - 3.4%

1998
Estrada 10,956,610 - 39.6%
De Venecia 4,390,853 - 15.9%
Roco 3,772,505 - 13.6%
Osmena 3,363,599 - 12.1%
Lim 2,397,224 - 8.7%
de Villa 1,337,856 - 4.8%
Santiago 807,506 - 2.9%
Enrile 344,532 - 1.2%
Marcos 247,094 - 0.89%
Dumlao 39,833 - 0.14%
Morato 19,770 - 7.14e-2%

Sabi ni mlq3:

The last time a president achieved an unquestionable majority was in 1965;

1965? Marcos only won by 52% over Macapagal's 43%.

Hindi ba ang sagot ay 1969? Where Marcos won by 61% over Osmena's 38%. Unless there was dayaan involved in the 1969 elections that i do not know of.

Since then, the best percentage a post-Edsa president has managed was 39.6 percent (Estrada in 1998). But this only put him on a par with the most underwhelming presidency of the Third Republic, that of Carlos P. Garcia, lone plurality president of his time, who obtained 41.3 percent (over time, it’s the percentage, not the number of votes that matters, since our population is always increasing).

Kaya mahirap makakuha ng majority victory ngayon ay dahil maraming major candidates ang sumasali sa presidential elections after edsa 1986.

Before 1986, it was pretty much a 2- or 3-way race for the presidency -- 1946, 1949, 1953, 1961, 1965, 1969, and the so called elections during 1981 (where marcos won with saddam hussein like numbers), and 1986.

The one time in 1957 where there were four big name candidates (fourth placer si Claro M. Recto sa election), Garcia did not reach above 50%.

Mahirap na talagang makakuha ng majority dahil sa dami ng malalakas ng presidential candidates na sumasali. FVR should know. tignan mo yung 1992. Six candidates (Ramos, Miriam, Cojuangco, Mitra, Imelda, Salonga) got double digit percentages in the number of votes cast. (Pero nakapag-govern naman si tabako ano, kahit na 24% lang ang nakuha niya).

Tignan nyo yung 1998 elections. Four candidates got 10% or more of the votes (fifth placer Fred Lim got 8.7%). There were 10 nationally recognized names running for the presidency at that time (erap, JDV, Roco, Osmena, Lim, de villa, imelda, enrile, santiago, morato). Mahahati talaga ang boto nyan.

Imagine if the Democrats and Republicans did away with the primaries at karambola ang nangyari. For the Democrats, si Hillary (first woman prez candidate), Barack Obama (first african american prez candidate), John Edwards, at Bill Richardson (latino vote, terrific resume) ang tatakbo. Sa Republicans naman, si Rudy Guliani, John McCain, Mitt Romney (First Mormon candidate).
7 nationally recognized candidates (with Bill richardson the least popular), sa tingin nyo ba may aabot rin ng 50% votes sa kanila pagdating ng 2008 presidential election???

Unlike kuya manuel, i think legit yung landslide ni erap, kahit na hindi majority ang nakuha niya.

There's a 23.7% difference between Erap and his nearest rival JDV. That was the biggest margin of victory since Marcos trounced Osmena Jr. in 1969 (23% difference). And second only to Magsaysay's dominance over Quirino (a whopping 38% difference).

Kahit na i-add mo yung percentage totals ng 2nd placer JDV at 3rd placer Roco (combined 29.5%), lamang pa rin si Estrada.

If you add JDV, Roco and Lito Osmena's vote percentage (41.6% total), talo lang nila si blundering plunderer by 2% points.

3 comments:

mlq3 said...

john,

the answer to your first question is in the rest of the sentence you quoted: "The last time a president achieved an unquestionable majority was in 1965; the last real landslide was in 1969." The distinction I was making was between ordinary majority victories -1946, 1949, 1961 and 1965, and the landslide victories of 1935, 1941, 1953 and 1969.

my point re JEE was, the percentage is what matters over time. and the percentage to my mind that matters for a president, is 50% or more. Anything less and the administration is automatically doomed unless the president shows some administrative gifts (FVR) or has a connection with the public (CCA and JEE).

JEE's was a landslide in comparison to his closest rival -but in historical terms, wasn't even as good a showing as CPG, precisely in a race similar to our modern races where there are several contenders with reasonable strengths for each. but since JEE did not get a majority, only a plurality, from the start those who wouldn't accept him could get the nerve to bide their time until JEE's popularity wore off.

For GMA, she needed, as I said then, a win: but a believable one. Not one accepted by everybody, but rather, acceptable to enough to make the rest live with it. But she also apparently felt it was not enough to win, but she had to win bigger, her win had to present a specific margin (1 m votes, never mind margins), and as time has passed, even the slim win has become debatable.

as you know from reading my blog, my view is that a run off election is a necessary reform if we are going to retain the multiparty system. if we will have a two party system, then chances are you don't need runoffs, but your choice will immediately only be limited to two. again, the indonesians, when they instituted free elections, looked at us as the closest culturally to them, but they decided to avoid our mistakes, which has been to make it virtually impossible since 1987 to have a president with a majority mandate.

john marzan said...

as you know from reading my blog, my view is that a run off election is a necessary reform if we are going to retain the multiparty system. if we will have a two party system, then chances are you don't need runoffs, but your choice will immediately only be limited to two. again, the indonesians, when they instituted free elections, looked at us as the closest culturally to them, but they decided to avoid our mistakes, which has been to make it virtually impossible since 1987 to have a president with a majority mandate.

a runoff is necessary talaga. hindi na natin kailangang mag parliamentary. yan ang reporma (pati ang pag regionalize ng senado) na dapat nating itulak.

john marzan said...

my point re JEE was, the percentage is what matters over time. and the percentage to my mind that matters for a president, is 50% or more. Anything less and the administration is automatically doomed unless the president shows some administrative gifts (FVR) or has a connection with the public (CCA and JEE).

i disagree. even if erap got a 50+% majority, it would not have prevented his downfall.

erap had no connection with the public? erap was still more popular than the opposition leaders then even when he was being impeached. here's the rest of the pre-edsa dos survey i've compiled.

no connection with the public is inaccurate. maybe no connection with the civil society and the church. ;)

i mean, if erap's had no connection with the masa, walang edsa tres rin.

For GMA, she needed, as I said then, a win: but a believable one. Not one accepted by everybody, but rather, acceptable to enough to make the rest live with it. But she also apparently felt it was not enough to win, but she had to win bigger, her win had to present a specific margin (1 m votes, never mind margins), and as time has passed, even the slim win has become debatable.

What we and she needed were credible elections, period. she didn't need to "win big". all she needed to do was to win without resorting to rigging the elections.

win or lose, i can live with the results as long as walang dayaan. i've proven it in the past by accepting (with dismay) the results of the 1998 elections even though i hated erap (PDI lang ang dyaryo namin dati eh) and voted for roco.

so i would have accepted/supported Arroyo as president kung siya talaga ang nanalo.